James A. Campbell

Alliance Defending Freedom’s Jim Campbell writes (along with 100 other Christians): “Arguments Separating Fashion Designers from other Artists Aren’t Worthy of the Runway.” In case you didn’t get it, the meta-title is a bit more revealing: “Freedom of Conscience — Melania Trump’s Fashion Designers Boycott & Same-Sex Marriage Cake Bakers.

This is tedious. I haven’t the strength to repeat the same post over and over, ad nauseum. The addition here is that I get to see another schmuck from ADF refer to a baker as a fucking “cake artist.” That in spite of the fact that numerous courts have ruled that even the most exquisite smearing of butter cream over spongecake is not artistry as that term is understood in the law.

I am guessing that Jim Campbell is James A. Campbell who has been practicing law since 2006 and who went to law school at the University of Akron. He apparently joined ADF in 2009 which is when he was licensed in Arizona (ADF claims 2007). Presumably he was not on a partnership track anywhere prior.

I will be brief. We expect people to follow the law. If someone is legally required to design a gown for a Trump then we expect them to design a gown for the Trump. All of ADF’s self-manufactured “victims” have violated state or local laws requiring public accommodations not to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. The all did discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. ADF’s lawyers should know this by now. They have lost every round of every similar case and the one chance that they had before the Supreme Court was denied certiorari while Scalia was still among the living. In fact, I think that was Campbell’s case (Elane Photography v. Willock).

The precedents:

ADF will continue to lose these cases. Even with more conservative justices I do not see a path to creating a religious exemption. The last time I wrote about Campbell his intellectual honesty was about the same.

Related content: